Medievalists.net

Where the Middle Ages Begin

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • Features
  • News
  • Online Courses
  • Podcast
  • Patreon Login
  • About Us & More
    • About Us
    • Books
    • Videos
    • Films & TV
    • Medieval Studies Programs
    • Places To See
    • Teaching Resources
    • Articles

Medievalists.net

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • Features
  • News
  • Online Courses
  • Podcast
  • Patreon Login
  • About Us & More
    • About Us
    • Books
    • Videos
    • Films & TV
    • Medieval Studies Programs
    • Places To See
    • Teaching Resources
    • Articles
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Articles

The Sovereign and His Counsellors : Ritualised Consultations in Muscovite Political Culture, 1350s-1570s

by Medievalists.net
September 25, 2008

The Sovereign and His Counsellors : Ritualised Consultations in Muscovite Political Culture, 1350s-1570s

Sergei Bogatyrev

Academic dissertation, Faculty of Arts, University of Helsinki, March 4, (2000)

Abstract

Starting from the 14th century, the Moscow princes’ power began to spread to other Russian lands. In the course of the next two centuries, Moscow gained dominion over huge territories with a variety of economic, political and cultural traditions. In order to control and rule such an extensive and varied country, the princes of Moscow developed a special kind of power, which is generally referred to as autocracy. The autocracy was a complex system which ought not to be reduced to the figure of the monarch alone.1 The Muscovite sovereign handled domestic and foreign policy with the aid of a close circle of counsellors. These counsellors played a highly important role in political and court life, participating in the preparation and implementation of political and administrative decisions.

Historians have a variety of opinions about the nature of the relations between the monarch and his counsellors in the Muscovite state. According to Richard Pipes, the crown tended to “humiliate anyone who by virtue of ancestry, office or wealth may have been inclined to become self-important.” In contrast, Edward Keenan argues that the Muscovite state was ruled by a centralised boyar oligarchy while the grand prince/tsar was little more than a figure-head. Similar ideas have been advanced by N. Sh. Kollmann.

Click here to read this thesis from the University of Helsinki

Moleiro

Subscribe to Medievalverse




Related Posts

  • The Rise of Muscovy
  • Impact of Viking raids lasted for centuries, historian finds
  • The Crimean Tatars and their Russian-Captive Slaves
  • Ivan the Terrible: Centralization in Sixteenth Century Muscovy
  • Townscape and Building Complexes in Medieval Western Anatolia under Turkish-Islamic Culture
TagsEarly Modern Period • Eastern Europe in the Middle Ages • Fifteenth Century • Fourteenth Century • Kingship in the Middle Ages • Later Middle Ages • Medieval Historiography • Medieval Politics • Medieval Russia • Medieval Social History • Moscow • Sixteenth Century

Post navigation

Previous Post Previous Post
Next Post Next Post

Medievalists Membership

Become a member to get ad-free access to our website and our articles. Thank you for supporting our website!

Sign Up Member Login

More from Medievalists.net

Become a Patron

We've created a Patreon for Medievalists.net as we want to transition to a more community-funded model.

 

We aim to be the leading content provider about all things medieval. Our website, podcast and Youtube page offers news and resources about the Middle Ages. We hope that are our audience wants to support us so that we can further develop our podcast, hire more writers, build more content, and remove the advertising on our platforms. This will also allow our fans to get more involved in what content we do produce.

Become a Patron Member Login

Medievalists.net

Footer Menu

  • Privacy Policy
  • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Copyright © 2025 Medievalists.net
  • Powered by WordPress
  • Theme: Uku by Elmastudio
Follow us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter