A long-running debate over the location of one of the most important battles fought in medieval England may finally be nearing an answer. A new study argues that the Battle of Brunanburh, fought in 937, took place at Bromborough on the Wirral, bringing fresh clarity to a question that has occupied historians for more than a century.
The book, Finding the Battle of Brunanburh, published by the University of Chester Press, is written by Paul Cavill, Honorary Associate Professor at the University of Nottingham, and Steve Harding, Professor Emeritus in Applied Biochemistry at the University of Nottingham. The authors present what they describe as the most comprehensive analysis of the available evidence yet undertaken.
Brunanburh was a decisive clash between the West Saxon king Athelstan and a coalition force led by King Anlaf of Dublin, King Constantine of Alba, and King Owain of Strathclyde. After a day-long and exceptionally bloody battle, Athelstan’s army emerged victorious. The defeated Hiberno-Norse forces retreated by sea to Dublin, while the northern British armies returned home. For Athelstan, the victory was the crowning moment of his reign, supporting his claim to be the “ruler of all Britain”.
The battle quickly became one of the most famous events of early medieval English history. More than 50 medieval writers recorded it in chronicles, poems, and historical narratives, yet none clearly identified where it was fought. Over the last hundred years, scholars have proposed numerous locations, often based on superficial similarities in place-names. Suggested sites have ranged widely across England, including Bourne, Burghwallis, Brinsworth, the River Browney, Burnley, Bromswold and Brumby.
Cavill and Harding argue that the key to resolving the problem lies in understanding the name Brunanburh itself. They note that the first element of the name, Bruna, is a personal name, while the second refers to a fortification. Crucially, there are only four known English place-names that contain the personal name Bruna, and three of them are clustered on the Wirral, in and around Bromborough. Early records of Bromborough, they argue, show that its name originally meant “Bruna’s fort”, precisely matching the form of Brunanburh.
The authors point out that none of the many alternative sites proposed over the years can be shown to have ever been called Brunanburh in medieval sources. Instead, those places had different historical names, raising the question of why the battle would have been recorded under a name not actually associated with them.
Beyond place-name evidence, the book brings together a wide range of sources, including literary, historical, linguistic, archaeological, and scientific data. The study also outlines an ongoing programme of chemical composition and isotope analysis aimed at determining whether Viking-Age metal objects found near Bromborough can be traced back to Scandinavia or Scotland.
Professor Cavill said: “This book argues from first principles that Bromborough is the likeliest location for the battle. It explains why we do not accept the many alternative proposals that have been put forward, and tries to articulate clearly, rationally and forcefully why the Wirral hypothesis is not only plausible but convincing.”
Professor Harding added: “One cannot doubt the interest that the battle of Brunanburh creates and retains in present-day discussion. The debate about this is sometimes heated, causing a polarisation of views.
“But this publication adds significant new material and analysis. Detailed analysis of the linguistic evidence seeks to answer the question, ‘what information can we glean from the names which are used in the sources for the battle site’? And a scientific protocol has been established based on chemical composition and chemical isotope analysis for testing whether significant numbers of any lead- or iron-based objects positively identified as coming from the Viking Age near Bromborough can be traced back to Scandinavia or Scotland.”
In the conclusion, the authors reflect on the scope of their investigation: “Our aim throughout has been to observe, test and report fairly on the various sources and reach reasoned conclusions. Our belief that the evidence points to Bromborough has been reinforced by this work: in this book, more than a thousand years on from the pivotal event, we have been Finding the Battle of Brunanburh.”
Further information about Finding the Battle of Brunanburh, including ordering details, is available from the University of Chester Press.
A long-running debate over the location of one of the most important battles fought in medieval England may finally be nearing an answer. A new study argues that the Battle of Brunanburh, fought in 937, took place at Bromborough on the Wirral, bringing fresh clarity to a question that has occupied historians for more than a century.
The book, Finding the Battle of Brunanburh, published by the University of Chester Press, is written by Paul Cavill, Honorary Associate Professor at the University of Nottingham, and Steve Harding, Professor Emeritus in Applied Biochemistry at the University of Nottingham. The authors present what they describe as the most comprehensive analysis of the available evidence yet undertaken.
Brunanburh was a decisive clash between the West Saxon king Athelstan and a coalition force led by King Anlaf of Dublin, King Constantine of Alba, and King Owain of Strathclyde. After a day-long and exceptionally bloody battle, Athelstan’s army emerged victorious. The defeated Hiberno-Norse forces retreated by sea to Dublin, while the northern British armies returned home. For Athelstan, the victory was the crowning moment of his reign, supporting his claim to be the “ruler of all Britain”.
The battle quickly became one of the most famous events of early medieval English history. More than 50 medieval writers recorded it in chronicles, poems, and historical narratives, yet none clearly identified where it was fought. Over the last hundred years, scholars have proposed numerous locations, often based on superficial similarities in place-names. Suggested sites have ranged widely across England, including Bourne, Burghwallis, Brinsworth, the River Browney, Burnley, Bromswold and Brumby.
Cavill and Harding argue that the key to resolving the problem lies in understanding the name Brunanburh itself. They note that the first element of the name, Bruna, is a personal name, while the second refers to a fortification. Crucially, there are only four known English place-names that contain the personal name Bruna, and three of them are clustered on the Wirral, in and around Bromborough. Early records of Bromborough, they argue, show that its name originally meant “Bruna’s fort”, precisely matching the form of Brunanburh.
The authors point out that none of the many alternative sites proposed over the years can be shown to have ever been called Brunanburh in medieval sources. Instead, those places had different historical names, raising the question of why the battle would have been recorded under a name not actually associated with them.
Beyond place-name evidence, the book brings together a wide range of sources, including literary, historical, linguistic, archaeological, and scientific data. The study also outlines an ongoing programme of chemical composition and isotope analysis aimed at determining whether Viking-Age metal objects found near Bromborough can be traced back to Scandinavia or Scotland.
Professor Cavill said: “This book argues from first principles that Bromborough is the likeliest location for the battle. It explains why we do not accept the many alternative proposals that have been put forward, and tries to articulate clearly, rationally and forcefully why the Wirral hypothesis is not only plausible but convincing.”
Professor Harding added: “One cannot doubt the interest that the battle of Brunanburh creates and retains in present-day discussion. The debate about this is sometimes heated, causing a polarisation of views.
“But this publication adds significant new material and analysis. Detailed analysis of the linguistic evidence seeks to answer the question, ‘what information can we glean from the names which are used in the sources for the battle site’? And a scientific protocol has been established based on chemical composition and chemical isotope analysis for testing whether significant numbers of any lead- or iron-based objects positively identified as coming from the Viking Age near Bromborough can be traced back to Scandinavia or Scotland.”
In the conclusion, the authors reflect on the scope of their investigation: “Our aim throughout has been to observe, test and report fairly on the various sources and reach reasoned conclusions. Our belief that the evidence points to Bromborough has been reinforced by this work: in this book, more than a thousand years on from the pivotal event, we have been Finding the Battle of Brunanburh.”
Further information about Finding the Battle of Brunanburh, including ordering details, is available from the University of Chester Press.
Top Image: Beginning of the annal for 937 in manuscript A of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle (MS CCCC 173, f. 26r)
Subscribe to Medievalverse
Related Posts