The Middle Ages were a time of remarkable innovation, when new technologies flourished. Yet the knowledge behind many of these inventions has been lost — sometimes because they were guarded as trade secrets, and sometimes because only their original creators understood them. Here are several medieval technologies that remain impossible to fully recreate, even with modern science.
Greek Fire
Hand-siphon for Greek fire – Codex Vaticanus Graecus 1605
Greek fire was the Byzantine navy’s terrifying secret: a burning liquid that could be hurled at enemy ships and then keep burning on the surface of the water. Contemporary writers loved the drama of it: bronze nozzles spitting flames from a ship’s deck, vessels and men set alight. In practice it behaved like a crude flamethrower, a weapon whose spectacle helped make it the stuff of legend.
Researchers have pieced together likely recipes and delivery systems from eyewitness accounts, later incendiary instructions, and a few archaeological finds — but these remain educated guesses rather than certainties. People suggest mixtures of oils, bitumen or asphalt, pine resin, and other sticky, flammable ingredients, all forced through pumps or siphons. Small ceramic pots, traces on burned timbers, and X-rays of containers give hints, but nothing yet offers a clear, repeatable formula or a complete pump to examine.
The reasons for this mystery are simple. The Byzantines kept the mixture secret — it was state knowledge. Medieval writers described the effects, not laboratory instructions. And the physical evidence that survives is fragmentary: centuries of burning, corrosion, and burial have erased the finer details. Ultimately, Greek fire is best described as a family of advanced incendiary techniques rather than one single, recoverable recipe.
A fragment of the sphero-conical vessel that was identified as containing a possibly explosive material from Jerusalem. Credit: Robert Mason, Royal Ontario Museum.
A similar problem surrounds naphtha, a name medieval sources use for volatile, petroleum-type liquids used as incendiaries across the Middle East. Accounts describe it as fiercely burning and useful for igniting projectiles or soaked rags, but writers used the term loosely, and distillation methods varied by place and time. Archaeology sometimes finds petroleum residues, but the label “naphtha” covered a range of products. Like Greek fire, it is better thought of as a broad category of combustible liquids known to medieval armies, not a single chemical that modern scientists can easily reproduce.
Damascene Steel
Close-up of a 13th-century Persian-forged Damascus steel sword – photo by Rahil Alipour Ata Abadi / Wikimedia Commons
Damascene steel was one of the marvels of the medieval world, famed for producing blades that were both razor-sharp and remarkably flexible. Originating in the Middle East and Central Asia, particularly from the workshops of Damascus, these blades were prized by warriors and collectors alike for their rippling, water-like surface patterns and unmatched cutting ability. The secret lay in a special type of high-carbon steel known as wootz, imported from India, which was forged and folded with exceptional skill. The result was a material that could slice through lesser metals without losing its edge — or so legend claims.
Yet despite centuries of admiration, the method of making true Damascene steel was lost by the 18th century. Modern metallurgists can produce steels with similar strength, but the exact combination of raw materials, forging temperatures, and cooling techniques that created its distinctive internal microstructure remains uncertain. The decline of Indian wootz production, changes in trade routes, and the secrecy of medieval craftsmen all contributed to its disappearance. What we call “Damascus steel” today imitates the visual patterns of the originals, but the true process that gave those legendary blades their unique properties has vanished into history.
Europe had its own metallurgical mystery as well: the Ulfberht sword. Made in northern Europe between the 9th and 11th centuries, these blades — marked with the name “+ULFBERH+T” — were centuries ahead of their time. Tests show that genuine Ulfberht swords were made from exceptionally pure, high-carbon steel, far cleaner and stronger than what most medieval blacksmiths could produce. Their quality is closer to modern industrial steel, suggesting access to advanced smelting or refining techniques that seem impossible for the period. How these swordsmiths achieved such purity remains a puzzle: perhaps through trade in crucible steel from Central Asia, or a closely guarded local process that disappeared as workshops closed. Like Damascene steel, the Ulfberht swords remind us that some of the Middle Ages’ finest technologies were anything but primitive.
The Shroud of Turin
High resolution of the face in the Shroud of Turin, taken in 2002 – photo by Rudolf Berwanger / Wikimedia Commons
The Shroud of Turin is one of history’s most debated artefacts — said to bear the image of Jesus Christ. Some regard it as miraculous, others as a sophisticated medieval forgery. For those who see it as man-made, the question remains: how exactly was it created? One common theory is that a skilled artist produced it using materials and methods available in the 14th century. The image may have been painted or rubbed with pigment or acid over a sculpted relief, creating a life-sized imprint with realistic shading. Modern experiments have shown that such results can be achieved with simple medieval tools, supporting the idea that the Shroud could be an artistic creation rather than a sacred relic.
Others propose more unusual explanations. Some suggest that chemical reactions from a decomposing body could have lightly scorched the linen fibres, while others believe a burst of radiation or light might have imprinted the image without burning the fabric. So far, none of these methods has perfectly replicated the Shroud’s unique, superficial image — one that only affects the outermost fibres of the cloth. Whether it was an act of faith or of remarkable artistry, the Shroud of Turin continues to intrigue scientists and believers alike.
Many of Europe’s great Gothic cathedrals still stand thanks to the remarkable mortars and plasters that hold their stones together — yet the exact recipes behind these materials have largely been lost. Medieval builders relied on lime mortars made by slaking burnt limestone and mixing it with sand, crushed brick, or stone dust. They often added organic ingredients such as milk, eggs, beer, or plant resins to improve flexibility and durability. These mixtures hardened slowly but bonded so perfectly with stone that they could last for centuries. Their knowledge passed from master to apprentice, built on experience, local materials, and a craftsman’s intuition for texture, timing, and curing.
Modern scientists and conservators have analysed surviving samples from Gothic buildings and found that no two mortars are quite the same. Some contain traces of sugars, proteins, or unusual mineral phases that can’t be replicated exactly today. We can reproduce the basic chemistry of medieval mortar, but not the subtle regional variations and long-term ageing processes that made these materials so enduring. The art of Gothic mortar-making was a blend of chemistry, craftsmanship, and environmental adaptation — a technology that remains difficult to match even with modern materials science.
Zwischgold
Zwischgold was a clever bit of medieval metalwork: an extremely thin layer of gold laid over thicker silver, used to gild statues, paintings, and manuscripts without wasting precious gold. Recent X-ray imaging shows the gold could be as thin as 30 nanometres, yet perfectly bonded to the silver by skilled craftsmen.
Even with these high-tech scans, no one knows exactly how it was made. No medieval manuals describe the hammering, folding, and tooling methods involved, and later documents only hint at complex techniques and special tools. The precise hands-on process that produced such an ultra-thin, stable layer of gold remains out of reach, reminding us how much of medieval artistry was based on skill and instinct that cannot easily be written down.
Chartres Blue
Pisces appearing in Chartres Cathedral in Chartres. Photo by Vassil / Wikimedia Commons
Visitors to Chartres Cathedral in France often remark on the thirteenth-century stained-glass windows glowing with a deep cobalt-blue hue. The blue glass at Chartres is especially famous: medieval glassmakers used cobalt oxide to produce its vivid colour, and the result remains visually striking even today.
Modern glassmakers can reproduce the hue, but the precise combination of materials and furnace conditions used at Chartres remains unknown. Regional sands, wood ashes, and even the choice of forest fuel likely influenced the result — details that were never written down. So while we understand the chemistry, the original “recipe” of the Chartres glassmakers remains elusive.
John Bradmore’s Arrow Extractor
Detail from Philmona showing a surgical instrument. British Library MS Harley 1736 fol. 48v
John Bradmore’s account of removing an arrowfrom the future Henry V of England is one of the clearest surviving surgical descriptions from the late Middle Ages — and it reads like a craftsman’s notebook as much as a medical report. Bradmore described how he created a special instrument:
“I prepared new tongs, small and hollow, the size of an arrow, and a screw that passed through the middle of the tongs. The end of the tongs were threaded inside and out; likewise the end of the screw that passed through the middle of them was threaded around in the manner of a screw so that it held better and more strongly.”
That vivid, hands-on description has invited close study by historians and surgeons, but it also leaves room for multiple interpretations — and that is why we can’t produce a single, definitive replica of Bradmore’s extractor. He described the materials and mechanism; an illustrated manuscript shows a surgical instrument, but no scaled drawings or precise measurements. The result is a clear procedure in words but an uncertain blueprint in practice. Experimental reconstructions can test different designs, but the exact form of Bradmore’s tool — and the craftsmanship that made it work — remain impossible to identify with certainty.
From the Byzantine warships of Constantinople to the workshops of Damascus, the Middle Ages were filled with creativity that still defies modern reproduction. Some of these secrets were lost through guarded tradition, others through shifting trade routes or the slow erosion of craft knowledge. Each example — whether weapon, artwork, or architectural marvel — reminds us that medieval technology was far from primitive. It was precise, inventive, and, in many ways, ahead of its time.
The Middle Ages were a time of remarkable innovation, when new technologies flourished. Yet the knowledge behind many of these inventions has been lost — sometimes because they were guarded as trade secrets, and sometimes because only their original creators understood them. Here are several medieval technologies that remain impossible to fully recreate, even with modern science.
Greek Fire
Greek fire was the Byzantine navy’s terrifying secret: a burning liquid that could be hurled at enemy ships and then keep burning on the surface of the water. Contemporary writers loved the drama of it: bronze nozzles spitting flames from a ship’s deck, vessels and men set alight. In practice it behaved like a crude flamethrower, a weapon whose spectacle helped make it the stuff of legend.
Researchers have pieced together likely recipes and delivery systems from eyewitness accounts, later incendiary instructions, and a few archaeological finds — but these remain educated guesses rather than certainties. People suggest mixtures of oils, bitumen or asphalt, pine resin, and other sticky, flammable ingredients, all forced through pumps or siphons. Small ceramic pots, traces on burned timbers, and X-rays of containers give hints, but nothing yet offers a clear, repeatable formula or a complete pump to examine.
The reasons for this mystery are simple. The Byzantines kept the mixture secret — it was state knowledge. Medieval writers described the effects, not laboratory instructions. And the physical evidence that survives is fragmentary: centuries of burning, corrosion, and burial have erased the finer details. Ultimately, Greek fire is best described as a family of advanced incendiary techniques rather than one single, recoverable recipe.
A similar problem surrounds naphtha, a name medieval sources use for volatile, petroleum-type liquids used as incendiaries across the Middle East. Accounts describe it as fiercely burning and useful for igniting projectiles or soaked rags, but writers used the term loosely, and distillation methods varied by place and time. Archaeology sometimes finds petroleum residues, but the label “naphtha” covered a range of products. Like Greek fire, it is better thought of as a broad category of combustible liquids known to medieval armies, not a single chemical that modern scientists can easily reproduce.
Damascene Steel
Damascene steel was one of the marvels of the medieval world, famed for producing blades that were both razor-sharp and remarkably flexible. Originating in the Middle East and Central Asia, particularly from the workshops of Damascus, these blades were prized by warriors and collectors alike for their rippling, water-like surface patterns and unmatched cutting ability. The secret lay in a special type of high-carbon steel known as wootz, imported from India, which was forged and folded with exceptional skill. The result was a material that could slice through lesser metals without losing its edge — or so legend claims.
Yet despite centuries of admiration, the method of making true Damascene steel was lost by the 18th century. Modern metallurgists can produce steels with similar strength, but the exact combination of raw materials, forging temperatures, and cooling techniques that created its distinctive internal microstructure remains uncertain. The decline of Indian wootz production, changes in trade routes, and the secrecy of medieval craftsmen all contributed to its disappearance. What we call “Damascus steel” today imitates the visual patterns of the originals, but the true process that gave those legendary blades their unique properties has vanished into history.
Europe had its own metallurgical mystery as well: the Ulfberht sword. Made in northern Europe between the 9th and 11th centuries, these blades — marked with the name “+ULFBERH+T” — were centuries ahead of their time. Tests show that genuine Ulfberht swords were made from exceptionally pure, high-carbon steel, far cleaner and stronger than what most medieval blacksmiths could produce. Their quality is closer to modern industrial steel, suggesting access to advanced smelting or refining techniques that seem impossible for the period. How these swordsmiths achieved such purity remains a puzzle: perhaps through trade in crucible steel from Central Asia, or a closely guarded local process that disappeared as workshops closed. Like Damascene steel, the Ulfberht swords remind us that some of the Middle Ages’ finest technologies were anything but primitive.
The Shroud of Turin
The Shroud of Turin is one of history’s most debated artefacts — said to bear the image of Jesus Christ. Some regard it as miraculous, others as a sophisticated medieval forgery. For those who see it as man-made, the question remains: how exactly was it created? One common theory is that a skilled artist produced it using materials and methods available in the 14th century. The image may have been painted or rubbed with pigment or acid over a sculpted relief, creating a life-sized imprint with realistic shading. Modern experiments have shown that such results can be achieved with simple medieval tools, supporting the idea that the Shroud could be an artistic creation rather than a sacred relic.
Others propose more unusual explanations. Some suggest that chemical reactions from a decomposing body could have lightly scorched the linen fibres, while others believe a burst of radiation or light might have imprinted the image without burning the fabric. So far, none of these methods has perfectly replicated the Shroud’s unique, superficial image — one that only affects the outermost fibres of the cloth. Whether it was an act of faith or of remarkable artistry, the Shroud of Turin continues to intrigue scientists and believers alike.
Gothic Mortar
Many of Europe’s great Gothic cathedrals still stand thanks to the remarkable mortars and plasters that hold their stones together — yet the exact recipes behind these materials have largely been lost. Medieval builders relied on lime mortars made by slaking burnt limestone and mixing it with sand, crushed brick, or stone dust. They often added organic ingredients such as milk, eggs, beer, or plant resins to improve flexibility and durability. These mixtures hardened slowly but bonded so perfectly with stone that they could last for centuries. Their knowledge passed from master to apprentice, built on experience, local materials, and a craftsman’s intuition for texture, timing, and curing.
Modern scientists and conservators have analysed surviving samples from Gothic buildings and found that no two mortars are quite the same. Some contain traces of sugars, proteins, or unusual mineral phases that can’t be replicated exactly today. We can reproduce the basic chemistry of medieval mortar, but not the subtle regional variations and long-term ageing processes that made these materials so enduring. The art of Gothic mortar-making was a blend of chemistry, craftsmanship, and environmental adaptation — a technology that remains difficult to match even with modern materials science.
Zwischgold
Zwischgold was a clever bit of medieval metalwork: an extremely thin layer of gold laid over thicker silver, used to gild statues, paintings, and manuscripts without wasting precious gold. Recent X-ray imaging shows the gold could be as thin as 30 nanometres, yet perfectly bonded to the silver by skilled craftsmen.
Even with these high-tech scans, no one knows exactly how it was made. No medieval manuals describe the hammering, folding, and tooling methods involved, and later documents only hint at complex techniques and special tools. The precise hands-on process that produced such an ultra-thin, stable layer of gold remains out of reach, reminding us how much of medieval artistry was based on skill and instinct that cannot easily be written down.
Chartres Blue
Visitors to Chartres Cathedral in France often remark on the thirteenth-century stained-glass windows glowing with a deep cobalt-blue hue. The blue glass at Chartres is especially famous: medieval glassmakers used cobalt oxide to produce its vivid colour, and the result remains visually striking even today.
Modern glassmakers can reproduce the hue, but the precise combination of materials and furnace conditions used at Chartres remains unknown. Regional sands, wood ashes, and even the choice of forest fuel likely influenced the result — details that were never written down. So while we understand the chemistry, the original “recipe” of the Chartres glassmakers remains elusive.
John Bradmore’s Arrow Extractor
John Bradmore’s account of removing an arrow from the future Henry V of England is one of the clearest surviving surgical descriptions from the late Middle Ages — and it reads like a craftsman’s notebook as much as a medical report. Bradmore described how he created a special instrument:
“I prepared new tongs, small and hollow, the size of an arrow, and a screw that passed through the middle of the tongs. The end of the tongs were threaded inside and out; likewise the end of the screw that passed through the middle of them was threaded around in the manner of a screw so that it held better and more strongly.”
That vivid, hands-on description has invited close study by historians and surgeons, but it also leaves room for multiple interpretations — and that is why we can’t produce a single, definitive replica of Bradmore’s extractor. He described the materials and mechanism; an illustrated manuscript shows a surgical instrument, but no scaled drawings or precise measurements. The result is a clear procedure in words but an uncertain blueprint in practice. Experimental reconstructions can test different designs, but the exact form of Bradmore’s tool — and the craftsmanship that made it work — remain impossible to identify with certainty.
From the Byzantine warships of Constantinople to the workshops of Damascus, the Middle Ages were filled with creativity that still defies modern reproduction. Some of these secrets were lost through guarded tradition, others through shifting trade routes or the slow erosion of craft knowledge. Each example — whether weapon, artwork, or architectural marvel — reminds us that medieval technology was far from primitive. It was precise, inventive, and, in many ways, ahead of its time.
Subscribe to Medievalverse
Related Posts