The spread of the Slavs stands as one of the most formative yet least understood events in medieval European history. Beginning in the sixth century AD, Slavic groups emerged in Byzantine and Western sources, spreading from the Baltic to the Balkans, and from the Elbe to the Volga. Yet in contrast to the dramatic migrations of the Goths or Langobards, or the feared incursions of the Huns, the Slavic story has remained puzzling.
Now, a groundbreaking study in the journal Nature has begun to provide answers. An international team of scholars led by the HistoGenes consortium has carried out the first comprehensive ancient DNA analysis of medieval Slavic populations. Sequencing over 550 ancient genomes, they have revealed that the Slavic expansion was, at its core, a movement of people—transforming Europe’s genetic and cultural map.
Historians have long struggled to explain the Slavic expansion. Early Slavic communities left little archaeological trace: cremation was widespread, their houses were simple, and their pottery plain and undecorated. Most significantly, they left no written records of their own for centuries. The very word “Slavs” was often an outsider’s label, later politicised in nationalist or ideological debates.
The key questions have always been: where did the Slavs come from, and how did they so thoroughly reshape Europe? Were they migrants arriving in great numbers, or local populations gradually adopting new cultural practices—a process of “Slavicisation”?
Until recently, evidence was scarce. Cremation limited DNA analysis, while the archaeological record remained ambiguous.
The new genetic study provides clarity. “While direct evidence from early Slavic core regions is still rare, our genetic results offer the first concrete clues to the formation of Slavic ancestry—pointing to a likely origin somewhere between the Dniester and Don rivers” says Joscha Gretzinger, a geneticist from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig and lead author of the study.
The team’s data show that Slavic ancestry traces back to the region spanning southern Belarus and central Ukraine. This area corresponds closely with what linguists and archaeologists had long hypothesised.
From the sixth century onwards, people carrying this ancestry began migrating west and south in large numbers. By the eighth century, their genetic signature had spread across wide areas of Central and Eastern Europe.
Migration on a Continental Scale
The study confirms that the Slavic spread was one of the largest demographic events in medieval Europe. In Eastern Germany and Poland, more than 80 percent of the population was replaced by newcomers from the east.
Yet this was not the march of conquering armies. Instead, entire families moved together, forming new communities. Genetic evidence shows no significant sex bias—men and women both contributed equally to these societies.
“Rather than a single people moving as one, the Slavic expansion was not a monolithic event but a mosaic of different groups, each adapting and blending in its own way—suggesting there was never just one ‘Slavic’ identity, but many.” explains Zuzana Hofmanová from the MPI EVA and Masaryk University in Brno, Czechia, one of the senior lead authors of the study.
The impact of Slavic migration varied by region, producing very different local outcomes.
Eastern Germany: Here, the transformation was most dramatic. Following the collapse of the Thuringian kingdom in the sixth century, more than 85 percent of the population was replaced by settlers from the east. Archaeology confirms that these communities were organised around extended kinship groups. Genetic data even reveal multi-generational pedigrees—large families linked through patrilineal descent. Women often married outside their home communities, reinforcing the interconnection of villages. Today, the Sorbs of Saxony retain a genetic profile closely tied to these early Slavic settlers, even after centuries of cultural change.
Poland: The story is one of almost complete replacement. Genetic results show that earlier inhabitants with strong Northern European and Scandinavian ties largely disappeared, replaced by migrants from the east. The site of Gródek, one of the earliest known Slavic inhumation cemeteries, provides direct evidence of these newcomers. Modern Poles, Ukrainians, and Belarusians share close genetic ties to these early settlers.
Croatia and the Northern Balkans: Here, the migration was less overwhelming. Eastern European newcomers mixed with diverse local populations, creating hybrid communities. At the site of Velim, some of the earliest Slavic burials already show about 30 percent local ancestry. In the Balkans today, Slavic ancestry makes up only part of the genetic profile, reflecting this blending process.
Czechia (Moravia): An independent study published simultaneously in Genome Biology confirms similar findings. Researchers found that in Southern Moravia, population shifts coincided with the spread of Slavic material culture originating from modern-day Ukraine. One of the earliest burials even included an infant in a Slavic context, narrowing the timeline for this transformation. This genetic signal continued into the ninth and tenth centuries, during the rise of the Moravian principality associated with Saints Cyril and Methodius.
A New Kind of Society
The genetic study also sheds light on how Slavic societies were structured. In Eastern Germany, the data reveal a profound shift from the Migration Period, when communities were small and diverse, to the Slavic Period, when large extended families dominated.
Cemeteries were arranged around kin groups, reflecting a patrilocal system: men remained in their home villages, while women moved to marry elsewhere. These extended networks avoided inbreeding and showed evidence of polygamy or serial partnerships.
Such flexible, family-based organisation may have been key to the Slavs’ success. Unlike the hierarchical structures of the Roman or post-Roman states, Slavic communities were more egalitarian and adaptable.
Why the Slavs Succeeded
The genetic findings support an interpretation that the Slavs spread not through conquest, but through resilience and adaptability. As Walter Pohl, one of the senior lead authors, explains, the migration represents “a demic diffusion or grass-root movement, often in small groups or temporary alliances, settling new territories without imposing a fixed identity or elite structures.”
This lifestyle may have made Slavic groups particularly suited to the turbulent centuries of late antiquity and the early Middle Ages. In a world disrupted by climate change, plague, and the decline of empires, simpler social systems with fewer hierarchies proved durable.
Johannes Krause, director at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology and another senior author of the study, highlights the scale of this transformation: “The spread of the Slavs was likely the last demographic event of continental scale to permanently and fundamentally reshape both the genetic and linguistic landscape of Europe.”
The Legacy of the Slavic Expansion
The echoes of these migrations remain deeply embedded in Europe today. The Slavic languages are now the largest language family on the continent, stretching from the Baltic to the Balkans, and from Central Europe to Siberia.
The genetic imprint of these early medieval movements persists as well. Modern populations in Poland, Belarus, Ukraine, and beyond carry strong traces of this Eastern European ancestry. Even outside Slavic-speaking communities, echoes remain—for example, in the mixed genetic profiles of Germans in Saxony compared with their Sorbian neighbours.
By combining genetics, archaeology, and history, the new research provides the clearest picture yet of how the Slavs reshaped Europe. It shows that migration, family, and adaptation—not conquest—lay at the heart of their success.
For decades, the origins and spread of the Slavs were debated through fragmentary evidence. Archaeologists argued over plain pottery and pit houses; historians wrestled with ambiguous chronicles. Now, thanks to ancient DNA, the picture has come into sharper focus.
With over 550 medieval genomes analysed, the study demonstrates that the rise of the Slavs was indeed a story of people on the move. But it was also a story of diversity, adaptation, and resilience. In some regions, newcomers replaced local populations almost entirely; in others, they blended into complex mosaics of culture and ancestry.
With these findings, researchers can now see beyond the gaps of the written and archaeological record. The Slavic migrations, once one of the most enigmatic events of the early Middle Ages, are revealed as one of the most transformative episodes in Europe’s past—an event whose legacy endures in languages, cultures, and DNA to this day.
The article, “Ancient DNA connects large-scale migration with the spread of Slavs,” by Joscha Gretzinger, Felix Biermann et al., is published in Nature. Click here to read it.
Top Image: The origin and dispersion of the Slavs in the 5-10th centuries – Wikimedia Commons
The spread of the Slavs stands as one of the most formative yet least understood events in medieval European history. Beginning in the sixth century AD, Slavic groups emerged in Byzantine and Western sources, spreading from the Baltic to the Balkans, and from the Elbe to the Volga. Yet in contrast to the dramatic migrations of the Goths or Langobards, or the feared incursions of the Huns, the Slavic story has remained puzzling.
Now, a groundbreaking study in the journal Nature has begun to provide answers. An international team of scholars led by the HistoGenes consortium has carried out the first comprehensive ancient DNA analysis of medieval Slavic populations. Sequencing over 550 ancient genomes, they have revealed that the Slavic expansion was, at its core, a movement of people—transforming Europe’s genetic and cultural map.
A Puzzle for Historians
Historians have long struggled to explain the Slavic expansion. Early Slavic communities left little archaeological trace: cremation was widespread, their houses were simple, and their pottery plain and undecorated. Most significantly, they left no written records of their own for centuries. The very word “Slavs” was often an outsider’s label, later politicised in nationalist or ideological debates.
The key questions have always been: where did the Slavs come from, and how did they so thoroughly reshape Europe? Were they migrants arriving in great numbers, or local populations gradually adopting new cultural practices—a process of “Slavicisation”?
Until recently, evidence was scarce. Cremation limited DNA analysis, while the archaeological record remained ambiguous.
Origins in Eastern Europe
The new genetic study provides clarity. “While direct evidence from early Slavic core regions is still rare, our genetic results offer the first concrete clues to the formation of Slavic ancestry—pointing to a likely origin somewhere between the Dniester and Don rivers” says Joscha Gretzinger, a geneticist from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig and lead author of the study.
The team’s data show that Slavic ancestry traces back to the region spanning southern Belarus and central Ukraine. This area corresponds closely with what linguists and archaeologists had long hypothesised.
From the sixth century onwards, people carrying this ancestry began migrating west and south in large numbers. By the eighth century, their genetic signature had spread across wide areas of Central and Eastern Europe.
Migration on a Continental Scale
The study confirms that the Slavic spread was one of the largest demographic events in medieval Europe. In Eastern Germany and Poland, more than 80 percent of the population was replaced by newcomers from the east.
Yet this was not the march of conquering armies. Instead, entire families moved together, forming new communities. Genetic evidence shows no significant sex bias—men and women both contributed equally to these societies.
“Rather than a single people moving as one, the Slavic expansion was not a monolithic event but a mosaic of different groups, each adapting and blending in its own way—suggesting there was never just one ‘Slavic’ identity, but many.” explains Zuzana Hofmanová from the MPI EVA and Masaryk University in Brno, Czechia, one of the senior lead authors of the study.
Regional Variations
The impact of Slavic migration varied by region, producing very different local outcomes.
Eastern Germany: Here, the transformation was most dramatic. Following the collapse of the Thuringian kingdom in the sixth century, more than 85 percent of the population was replaced by settlers from the east. Archaeology confirms that these communities were organised around extended kinship groups. Genetic data even reveal multi-generational pedigrees—large families linked through patrilineal descent. Women often married outside their home communities, reinforcing the interconnection of villages. Today, the Sorbs of Saxony retain a genetic profile closely tied to these early Slavic settlers, even after centuries of cultural change.
Poland: The story is one of almost complete replacement. Genetic results show that earlier inhabitants with strong Northern European and Scandinavian ties largely disappeared, replaced by migrants from the east. The site of Gródek, one of the earliest known Slavic inhumation cemeteries, provides direct evidence of these newcomers. Modern Poles, Ukrainians, and Belarusians share close genetic ties to these early settlers.
Croatia and the Northern Balkans: Here, the migration was less overwhelming. Eastern European newcomers mixed with diverse local populations, creating hybrid communities. At the site of Velim, some of the earliest Slavic burials already show about 30 percent local ancestry. In the Balkans today, Slavic ancestry makes up only part of the genetic profile, reflecting this blending process.
Czechia (Moravia): An independent study published simultaneously in Genome Biology confirms similar findings. Researchers found that in Southern Moravia, population shifts coincided with the spread of Slavic material culture originating from modern-day Ukraine. One of the earliest burials even included an infant in a Slavic context, narrowing the timeline for this transformation. This genetic signal continued into the ninth and tenth centuries, during the rise of the Moravian principality associated with Saints Cyril and Methodius.
A New Kind of Society
The genetic study also sheds light on how Slavic societies were structured. In Eastern Germany, the data reveal a profound shift from the Migration Period, when communities were small and diverse, to the Slavic Period, when large extended families dominated.
Cemeteries were arranged around kin groups, reflecting a patrilocal system: men remained in their home villages, while women moved to marry elsewhere. These extended networks avoided inbreeding and showed evidence of polygamy or serial partnerships.
Such flexible, family-based organisation may have been key to the Slavs’ success. Unlike the hierarchical structures of the Roman or post-Roman states, Slavic communities were more egalitarian and adaptable.
Why the Slavs Succeeded
The genetic findings support an interpretation that the Slavs spread not through conquest, but through resilience and adaptability. As Walter Pohl, one of the senior lead authors, explains, the migration represents “a demic diffusion or grass-root movement, often in small groups or temporary alliances, settling new territories without imposing a fixed identity or elite structures.”
This lifestyle may have made Slavic groups particularly suited to the turbulent centuries of late antiquity and the early Middle Ages. In a world disrupted by climate change, plague, and the decline of empires, simpler social systems with fewer hierarchies proved durable.
Johannes Krause, director at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology and another senior author of the study, highlights the scale of this transformation: “The spread of the Slavs was likely the last demographic event of continental scale to permanently and fundamentally reshape both the genetic and linguistic landscape of Europe.”
The Legacy of the Slavic Expansion
The echoes of these migrations remain deeply embedded in Europe today. The Slavic languages are now the largest language family on the continent, stretching from the Baltic to the Balkans, and from Central Europe to Siberia.
The genetic imprint of these early medieval movements persists as well. Modern populations in Poland, Belarus, Ukraine, and beyond carry strong traces of this Eastern European ancestry. Even outside Slavic-speaking communities, echoes remain—for example, in the mixed genetic profiles of Germans in Saxony compared with their Sorbian neighbours.
By combining genetics, archaeology, and history, the new research provides the clearest picture yet of how the Slavs reshaped Europe. It shows that migration, family, and adaptation—not conquest—lay at the heart of their success.
A Chapter Rewritten
For decades, the origins and spread of the Slavs were debated through fragmentary evidence. Archaeologists argued over plain pottery and pit houses; historians wrestled with ambiguous chronicles. Now, thanks to ancient DNA, the picture has come into sharper focus.
With over 550 medieval genomes analysed, the study demonstrates that the rise of the Slavs was indeed a story of people on the move. But it was also a story of diversity, adaptation, and resilience. In some regions, newcomers replaced local populations almost entirely; in others, they blended into complex mosaics of culture and ancestry.
With these findings, researchers can now see beyond the gaps of the written and archaeological record. The Slavic migrations, once one of the most enigmatic events of the early Middle Ages, are revealed as one of the most transformative episodes in Europe’s past—an event whose legacy endures in languages, cultures, and DNA to this day.
The article, “Ancient DNA connects large-scale migration with the spread of Slavs,” by Joscha Gretzinger, Felix Biermann et al., is published in Nature. Click here to read it.
Top Image: The origin and dispersion of the Slavs in the 5-10th centuries – Wikimedia Commons
Subscribe to Medievalverse
Related Posts