Medieval ‘Cultural Landscapes’: Construction, Perception, and Evaluation – in the Middle Ages and Today
By Gerhard Jaritz
Paper given at the Yeongwol Yonsei Forum (2011)
Introduction: The European Landscape Convention defined ‘landscape’ as an “area, as perceived by people, whose character is the result of the action and interaction of natural and/or human factors.” “It covers natural, rural, urban and peri-urban areas.” Thus, it is the sum of all changes to the environment; “it is where past and present meet.” The Florence definition comes quite close to the description of ‘cultural landscape’, as it is offered by the UNESCO World Heritage Guidelines: cultural landscapes “represent the combined work of nature and man.” Any part of the land can be recognized as ‘cultural landscape’, “from a dump site to a thoroughbred horse farm, from the corridor along a multilane freeway to a network of nature paths, from a utilitarian domestic yard to a national park, from a squatter settlement to an elite suburban enclave.” Such discussions about and definitions of ‘(cultuAal) landscape’ are the continuation of a discourse that has mainly started in German geographical research at the end of the nineteenth century.
Click here to read this article from the Yeongwol Yonsei Forum
Medieval ‘Cultural Landscapes’: Construction, Perception, and Evaluation – in the Middle Ages and Today
By Gerhard Jaritz
Paper given at the Yeongwol Yonsei Forum (2011)
Introduction: The European Landscape Convention defined ‘landscape’ as an “area, as perceived by people, whose character is the result of the action and interaction of natural and/or human factors.” “It covers natural, rural, urban and peri-urban areas.” Thus, it is the sum of all changes to the environment; “it is where past and present meet.” The Florence definition comes quite close to the description of ‘cultural landscape’, as it is offered by the UNESCO World Heritage Guidelines: cultural landscapes “represent the combined work of nature and man.” Any part of the land can be recognized as ‘cultural landscape’, “from a dump site to a thoroughbred horse farm, from the corridor along a multilane freeway to a network of nature paths, from a utilitarian domestic yard to a national park, from a squatter settlement to an elite suburban enclave.” Such discussions about and definitions of ‘(cultuAal) landscape’ are the continuation of a discourse that has mainly started in German geographical research at the end of the nineteenth century.
Click here to read this article from the Yeongwol Yonsei Forum
Related Posts
Subscribe to Medievalverse