<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Medievalists.net &#187; Sir John Fortescue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.medievalists.net/tag/sir-john-fortescue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.medievalists.net</link>
	<description>Where the Middle Ages Begin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 05:01:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Judging Female Judges: Sir John Fortescue’s Vision of Women as Judges in De Natura Legis Naturae</title>
		<link>http://www.medievalists.net/2013/11/14/judging-female-judges-sir-john-fortescues-vision-of-women-as-judges-in-de-natura-legis-naturae/</link>
		<comments>http://www.medievalists.net/2013/11/14/judging-female-judges-sir-john-fortescues-vision-of-women-as-judges-in-de-natura-legis-naturae/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 23:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medievalists.net]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[De Natura Legis Naturae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecclesiastical History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifteenth Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourteenth Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Late Middle Ages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medieval Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sir John Fortescue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social History]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medievalists.net/?p=44883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Judging Female Judges: Sir John Fortescue’s Vision of Women as Judges in De Natura Legis Naturae  Emma Hawkes Limina, Volume 8, (2002) Abstract The fifteenth-century English legal commentary, De Natura Legis Naturae, is probably the most obscure of Sir John Fortescue’s renowned writings. Fortescue’s text examines female authority more explicitly than his other writings, there has, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net/2013/11/14/judging-female-judges-sir-john-fortescues-vision-of-women-as-judges-in-de-natura-legis-naturae/">Judging Female Judges: Sir John Fortescue’s Vision of Women as Judges in De Natura Legis Naturae</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net">Medievalists.net</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.medievalists.net/2013/11/14/judging-female-judges-sir-john-fortescues-vision-of-women-as-judges-in-de-natura-legis-naturae/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sir John Fortescue and the French Polemical Treatises of the Hundred Years War</title>
		<link>http://www.medievalists.net/2013/02/10/sir-john-fortescue-and-the-french-polemical-treatises-of-the-hundred-years-war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.medievalists.net/2013/02/10/sir-john-fortescue-and-the-french-polemical-treatises-of-the-hundred-years-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 01:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medievalists.net]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Early Modern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward IV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifteenth Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry VI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hundred Years' War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King Henry IV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Late Middle Ages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renaissance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sir John Fortescue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medievalists.net/?p=39182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Inevitably Fortescue had to adopt new arguments for the defence of Henry VI. To this end he asserted that the Lancastrians now had a just title through divine and ecclesiastical approbation, popular consent and prescription, but the core of his case was a direct response to the Yorkist claim that they had a superior hereditary title to the throne.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net/2013/02/10/sir-john-fortescue-and-the-french-polemical-treatises-of-the-hundred-years-war/">Sir John Fortescue and the French Polemical Treatises of the Hundred Years War</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net">Medievalists.net</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.medievalists.net/2013/02/10/sir-john-fortescue-and-the-french-polemical-treatises-of-the-hundred-years-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.086 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2015-12-07 10:53:33 -->
