<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Medievalists.net &#187; Ockham</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.medievalists.net/tag/ockham/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.medievalists.net</link>
	<description>Where the Middle Ages Begin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2015 23:06:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Emotions and Cognitions : Fourteenth-Century Discussions on the Passions of the Soul</title>
		<link>http://www.medievalists.net/2014/08/22/emotions-cognitions-fourteenth-century-discussions-passions-soul/</link>
		<comments>http://www.medievalists.net/2014/08/22/emotions-cognitions-fourteenth-century-discussions-passions-soul/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medievalists.net]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourteenth Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Late Middle Ages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ockham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medievalists.net/?p=52042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Medieval philosophers clearly recognized that emotions are not simply “raw feelings” but complex mental states that include cognitive components. They analyzed these components both on the sensory and on the intellectual level, paying particular attention to the different types of cognition that are involved.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net/2014/08/22/emotions-cognitions-fourteenth-century-discussions-passions-soul/">Emotions and Cognitions : Fourteenth-Century Discussions on the Passions of the Soul</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net">Medievalists.net</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.medievalists.net/2014/08/22/emotions-cognitions-fourteenth-century-discussions-passions-soul/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Calamitous Fourteenth Century in England: All Doom and Gloom?</title>
		<link>http://www.medievalists.net/2013/05/28/the-calamitous-fourteenth-century-in-england-all-doom-and-gloom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.medievalists.net/2013/05/28/the-calamitous-fourteenth-century-in-england-all-doom-and-gloom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 14:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medievalists.net]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adelard of Bath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arabic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duns Scotus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eleventh Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifteenth Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourteenth Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Franciscan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerard of Cremona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Middle Ages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Dumbledon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John of Dumbleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Late Middle Ages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mendicant Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monasticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ockham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxford Calculators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petrus Alphonsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Questions on Natural Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Swineshead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Grosseteste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Bacon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger of Hereford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saint Edmund of Abington/Edmund Rich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Summary of Logic and Natural Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twelfth Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Oxford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medievalists.net/?p=41331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This was a fantastic paper given at the Crown and Country in Late medieval England session at KZOO. There were only two papers but both were interesting and enjoyable. This paper delved into the history of science in late medieval England and examined why the fourteenth century, a time that is usually synonymous with doom and gloom, plague and uprising, wasn't all that bad upon closer observation.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net/2013/05/28/the-calamitous-fourteenth-century-in-england-all-doom-and-gloom/">The Calamitous Fourteenth Century in England: All Doom and Gloom?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net">Medievalists.net</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.medievalists.net/2013/05/28/the-calamitous-fourteenth-century-in-england-all-doom-and-gloom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Idea of Natural Rights &#8211; Origins and Persistence</title>
		<link>http://www.medievalists.net/2012/06/10/the-idea-of-natural-rights-origins-and-persistence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.medievalists.net/2012/06/10/the-idea-of-natural-rights-origins-and-persistence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medievalists.net]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Early Modern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Franciscan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hobbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nationalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ockham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medievalists.net/?p=32600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Before turning to this early history there is one more aspect of the contemporary situation that I need to mention. Even in the Western world, the original homeland of natural rights thinking, there is no consensus—and sometimes overt skepticism—about the existence and grounding of such rights.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net/2012/06/10/the-idea-of-natural-rights-origins-and-persistence/">The Idea of Natural Rights &#8211; Origins and Persistence</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net">Medievalists.net</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.medievalists.net/2012/06/10/the-idea-of-natural-rights-origins-and-persistence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Faith and reason: charting the medieval concept of the infinite</title>
		<link>http://www.medievalists.net/2012/04/23/faith-and-reason-charting-the-medieval-concept-of-the-infinite/</link>
		<comments>http://www.medievalists.net/2012/04/23/faith-and-reason-charting-the-medieval-concept-of-the-infinite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 01:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medievalists.net]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duns Scotus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Franciscan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Middle Ages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ockham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twelfth Century]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medievalists.net/?p=31260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I would like to start with some assumptions. First, I take it for granted that the apposition of negative terms to the Almighty God became quite early an accepted practice in Christianity, which caused in turn that the infinite, as an opposite term to something easily convenient to positive delineation, was admitted in the repertoire of God’s adverbial description. </p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net/2012/04/23/faith-and-reason-charting-the-medieval-concept-of-the-infinite/">Faith and reason: charting the medieval concept of the infinite</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net">Medievalists.net</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.medievalists.net/2012/04/23/faith-and-reason-charting-the-medieval-concept-of-the-infinite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>William of Ockham’s Early Theory of Property Rights: Sources, Texts, and Contexts</title>
		<link>http://www.medievalists.net/2012/04/22/william-of-ockhams-early-theory-of-property-rights-sources-texts-and-contexts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.medievalists.net/2012/04/22/william-of-ockhams-early-theory-of-property-rights-sources-texts-and-contexts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 23:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medievalists.net]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourteenth Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Franciscan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Middle Ages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historiography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Late Middle Ages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mendicant Orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ockham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thirteenth century]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medievalists.net/?p=31199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This thesis is nominally about William of Ockham, a theologian who did not care to read potentially damning papal constitutions until tapped to do so by a superior (superiore mandate). Following a suggestion of R. G. Collingwood, a proper first question we should ask, is what was this supposedly unwilling theologian trying to do by composing the longest defense of Franciscan poverty ever written?</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net/2012/04/22/william-of-ockhams-early-theory-of-property-rights-sources-texts-and-contexts/">William of Ockham’s Early Theory of Property Rights: Sources, Texts, and Contexts</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net">Medievalists.net</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.medievalists.net/2012/04/22/william-of-ockhams-early-theory-of-property-rights-sources-texts-and-contexts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Failure of Ockham&#8217;s Nominalism</title>
		<link>http://www.medievalists.net/2012/03/03/the-failure-of-ockhams-nominalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.medievalists.net/2012/03/03/the-failure-of-ockhams-nominalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 04:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medievalists.net]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ockham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medievalists.net/?p=29780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In this paper I want to explore the reasons for Ockham’s surprising vacillation—not as an historical or biographical exercise, but to uncover the insights which nourished his positive views about nominalism and which also cast him into such uncertainty.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net/2012/03/03/the-failure-of-ockhams-nominalism/">The Failure of Ockham&#8217;s Nominalism</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net">Medievalists.net</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.medievalists.net/2012/03/03/the-failure-of-ockhams-nominalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ockham on the Concept</title>
		<link>http://www.medievalists.net/2010/11/19/ockham-on-the-concept/</link>
		<comments>http://www.medievalists.net/2010/11/19/ockham-on-the-concept/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 19:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medievalists.net]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourteenth Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Franciscan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heresy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monasticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ockham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thirteenth century]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medievalists.net/?p=12667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ockham on the Concept Boler, John (University of Washington) Medieval Philosophy and Theology 11 (2003) Abstract It is a commonplace of Ockham commentary that he changed his position on what concepts are. While I see no reason to question the general lines of the familiar story, I do think there are some interesting details along [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net/2010/11/19/ockham-on-the-concept/">Ockham on the Concept</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net">Medievalists.net</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.medievalists.net/2010/11/19/ockham-on-the-concept/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Is Material Supposition Possible?</title>
		<link>http://www.medievalists.net/2010/10/25/how-is-material-supposition-possible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.medievalists.net/2010/10/25/how-is-material-supposition-possible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 02:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medievalists.net]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifteenth Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourteenth Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ockham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul of Venice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medievalists.net/?p=11700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>How Is Material Supposition Possible? Read, Stephen (University of St. Andrews) Medieval Philosophy and Theology 8 (1999) Abstract In an insightful article on the medieval theory of supposition, Elizabeth Karger noted a remarkable development in the characterization of the material mode of supposition between William of Ockham and his contemporaries in the early fourteenth century [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net/2010/10/25/how-is-material-supposition-possible/">How Is Material Supposition Possible?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net">Medievalists.net</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.medievalists.net/2010/10/25/how-is-material-supposition-possible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nicholas of Autrecourt and William of Ockham on Atomism, Nominalism, and the Ontology of Motion</title>
		<link>http://www.medievalists.net/2010/10/01/nicholas-of-autrecourt-and-william-of-ockham-on-atomism-nominalism-and-the-ontology-of-motion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.medievalists.net/2010/10/01/nicholas-of-autrecourt-and-william-of-ockham-on-atomism-nominalism-and-the-ontology-of-motion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 18:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medievalists.net]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourteenth Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicholas of Autrecourt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ockham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medievalists.net/?p=10793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Nicholas of Autrecourt and William of Ockham on Atomism, Nominalism, and the Ontology of Motion Dutton, Blake D. Medieval Philosophy and Theology, vol. 5, no. 1 (1996) Abstract Nicholas of Autrecourt has been of interest to scholars primarily because of his place within the skeptical currents of fourteenth-century philosophy. However, just as there has been [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net/2010/10/01/nicholas-of-autrecourt-and-william-of-ockham-on-atomism-nominalism-and-the-ontology-of-motion/">Nicholas of Autrecourt and William of Ockham on Atomism, Nominalism, and the Ontology of Motion</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net">Medievalists.net</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.medievalists.net/2010/10/01/nicholas-of-autrecourt-and-william-of-ockham-on-atomism-nominalism-and-the-ontology-of-motion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ockham and Ambiguity</title>
		<link>http://www.medievalists.net/2010/09/30/ockham-and-ambiguity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.medievalists.net/2010/09/30/ockham-and-ambiguity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medievalists.net]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourteenth Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Franciscan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monasticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ockham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thirteenth century]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medievalists.net/?p=10738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ockham and Ambiguity Sinkler, Georgette Medieval Philosophy and Theology, vol. 4 (1994) Abstract In the Sophistichi eknchi, Aristotle identifies thirteen types of fallacies or ways one can go wrong in arguing. According to Aristotle, of these fallacies, six come about in language, and seven are independent of language. The six in language can be characterized [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net/2010/09/30/ockham-and-ambiguity/">Ockham and Ambiguity</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net">Medievalists.net</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.medievalists.net/2010/09/30/ockham-and-ambiguity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.117 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2015-12-06 19:44:23 -->
