<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Medievalists.net &#187; Averroes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.medievalists.net/tag/averroes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.medievalists.net</link>
	<description>Where the Middle Ages Begin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2015 23:06:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The Morality of Misogyny: The Case of Rustico Filippi, Vituperator of Women</title>
		<link>http://www.medievalists.net/2014/11/30/morality-misogyny-case-rustico-filippi-vituperator-women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.medievalists.net/2014/11/30/morality-misogyny-case-rustico-filippi-vituperator-women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2014 23:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medievalists.net]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Averroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourteenth Century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medieval Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rustico Filippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thirteenth century]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tuscany]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medievalists.net/?p=54522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>At the outset of his influential study on Rabelais, Mikhail Bakhtin makes an interesting observation. The scholar dedicates several pages to detail how the French author’s critical reception changed over time. Bakhtin illustrates how the attempt to comprehend an author can frequently be stymied by the cultural changes that occur across the centuries.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net/2014/11/30/morality-misogyny-case-rustico-filippi-vituperator-women/">The Morality of Misogyny: The Case of Rustico Filippi, Vituperator of Women</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net">Medievalists.net</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.medievalists.net/2014/11/30/morality-misogyny-case-rustico-filippi-vituperator-women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Islamic Scholar Who Gave Us Modern Philosophy</title>
		<link>http://www.medievalists.net/2013/02/20/the-islamic-scholar-who-gave-us-modern-philosophy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.medievalists.net/2013/02/20/the-islamic-scholar-who-gave-us-modern-philosophy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medievalists.net]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Averroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medievalists.net/?p=39356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Abū al-Walīd Muhammad ibn Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn Rushd—or Averroës, as he was known to Latin readers—was born in 1126 at the far western edge of the Islamic world, in Córdoba, Spain.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net/2013/02/20/the-islamic-scholar-who-gave-us-modern-philosophy/">The Islamic Scholar Who Gave Us Modern Philosophy</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net">Medievalists.net</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.medievalists.net/2013/02/20/the-islamic-scholar-who-gave-us-modern-philosophy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Religious and Scientific Duality of Thought:  How Ibn Rushd and al-Ghazili Set the Agenda for Medieval Scholastic Debates</title>
		<link>http://www.medievalists.net/2012/05/17/religious-and-scientific-duality-of-thought-how-ibn-rushd-and-al-ghazili-set-the-agenda-for-medieval-scholastic-debates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.medievalists.net/2012/05/17/religious-and-scientific-duality-of-thought-how-ibn-rushd-and-al-ghazili-set-the-agenda-for-medieval-scholastic-debates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 17:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medievalists.net]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Ghazali]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Averroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medievalists.net/?p=31825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ibn Rushd’s response to al-Ghazili ’s rather specious use of logic introduces the differentiation of religious and “scientific” or philosophical truths: an important, necessary, and previously unarticulated distinction which reverberated in the cathedrals and universities of Europe and which remains relevant for contemporary thinkers faced with similar dilemmas.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net/2012/05/17/religious-and-scientific-duality-of-thought-how-ibn-rushd-and-al-ghazili-set-the-agenda-for-medieval-scholastic-debates/">Religious and Scientific Duality of Thought:  How Ibn Rushd and al-Ghazili Set the Agenda for Medieval Scholastic Debates</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net">Medievalists.net</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.medievalists.net/2012/05/17/religious-and-scientific-duality-of-thought-how-ibn-rushd-and-al-ghazili-set-the-agenda-for-medieval-scholastic-debates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memory, Individuals, and the Past in Averroes&#8217;s Psychology</title>
		<link>http://www.medievalists.net/2010/10/04/memory-individuals-and-the-past-in-averroess-psychology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.medievalists.net/2010/10/04/memory-individuals-and-the-past-in-averroess-psychology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 04:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medievalists.net]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Averroes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twelfth Century]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medievalists.net/?p=10916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Despite the resurgence of interest in the medieval conception of memory among scholars working in a wide variety of disciplines within medieval studies, little attention has been paid in recent times to the conception of memory found in the psychological writings of medieval philosophers, especially those from the Arabic tradition. </p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net/2010/10/04/memory-individuals-and-the-past-in-averroess-psychology/">Memory, Individuals, and the Past in Averroes&#8217;s Psychology</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medievalists.net">Medievalists.net</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.medievalists.net/2010/10/04/memory-individuals-and-the-past-in-averroess-psychology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.098 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2015-12-06 20:23:24 -->
