Capital and Corporal Punishment in Anglo-Saxon England
Lecture by Jay Gates, Nicole Marafioti and Valerie Allen
Given at John Jay College on November 14, 2014
Jay Gates, Associate Professor of English at John Jay College, is joined by his co-editor Nicole Marafioti, Assistant Professor of History at Trinity University, and contributor Valerie Allen, Professor of English at John Jay College, in a presentation of their respective chapters from Capital and Corporal Punishment in Anglo-Saxon England, which was published by Boydell and Brewer in 2014.
Anglo-Saxon authorities often punished lawbreakers with harsh corporal penalties, such as execution, mutilation and imprisonment. Despite their severity, however, these penalties were not arbitrary exercises of power. Rather, they were informed by nuanced philosophies of punishment which sought to resolve conflict, keep the peace and enforce Christian morality. The ten essays in Capital and Corporal Punishment in Anglo-Saxon England engage legal, literary, historical, and archaeological evidence to investigate the role of punishment in Anglo-Saxon society.
Advertisement
Three dominant themes emerge in the collection. First is the shift from a culture of retributive feud to a system of top-down punishment, in which penalties were imposed by an authority figure responsible for keeping the peace. Second is the use of spectacular punishment to enhance royal standing, as Anglo-Saxon kings sought to centralize and legitimize their power. Third is the intersection of secular punishment and penitential practice, as Christian authorities tempered penalties for material crime with concern for the souls of the condemned. Together, these studies demonstrate that in Anglo-Saxon England, capital and corporal punishments were considered necessary, legitimate, and righteous methods of social control.
Capital and Corporal Punishment in Anglo-Saxon England
Lecture by Jay Gates, Nicole Marafioti and Valerie Allen
Given at John Jay College on November 14, 2014
Jay Gates, Associate Professor of English at John Jay College, is joined by his co-editor Nicole Marafioti, Assistant Professor of History at Trinity University, and contributor Valerie Allen, Professor of English at John Jay College, in a presentation of their respective chapters from Capital and Corporal Punishment in Anglo-Saxon England, which was published by Boydell and Brewer in 2014.
Anglo-Saxon authorities often punished lawbreakers with harsh corporal penalties, such as execution, mutilation and imprisonment. Despite their severity, however, these penalties were not arbitrary exercises of power. Rather, they were informed by nuanced philosophies of punishment which sought to resolve conflict, keep the peace and enforce Christian morality. The ten essays in Capital and Corporal Punishment in Anglo-Saxon England engage legal, literary, historical, and archaeological evidence to investigate the role of punishment in Anglo-Saxon society.
Three dominant themes emerge in the collection. First is the shift from a culture of retributive feud to a system of top-down punishment, in which penalties were imposed by an authority figure responsible for keeping the peace. Second is the use of spectacular punishment to enhance royal standing, as Anglo-Saxon kings sought to centralize and legitimize their power. Third is the intersection of secular punishment and penitential practice, as Christian authorities tempered penalties for material crime with concern for the souls of the condemned. Together, these studies demonstrate that in Anglo-Saxon England, capital and corporal punishments were considered necessary, legitimate, and righteous methods of social control.
See also: Capital and Corporal Punishment may have been rare in Anglo-Saxon England, researcher suggests
Related Posts
Subscribe to Medievalverse