The cost of enclosure and the benefits of convertible husbandry among peasant holdings in
medieval England
KITSIKOPOULOS, HARRY
Conference Book, Vol. 1, European Historical Economics Society, September (2001)
Abstract
The enclosure of common-fields and the adoption of convertible husbandry were two developments of vital importance for the agricultural revolution that swept the English economy during the early modern period and led it eventually to breaking away from the Malthusian trap. Both of these phenomena can be traced back to the Middle Ages, but they were
rather exceptional at that time.
Advertisement
The disposal and utilization of land in the Middle Ages was ultimately a seigneurial prerogative and hence the limited instances of structural innovation in the form of enclosures and convertible husbandry can be explicated, to a large extent, by looking at the political and economic dimensions of manorial estates. Peasants, however, were not powerless entities since they were, after all, the ones who engaged in direct production, either in their own plots or in demesnes. Hence, any effort to innovate, especially on a large scale, presupposed their consent and cooperation.
The cost of enclosure and the benefits of convertible husbandry among peasant holdings in
medieval England
KITSIKOPOULOS, HARRY
Conference Book, Vol. 1, European Historical Economics Society, September (2001)
Abstract
The enclosure of common-fields and the adoption of convertible husbandry were two developments of vital importance for the agricultural revolution that swept the English economy during the early modern period and led it eventually to breaking away from the Malthusian trap. Both of these phenomena can be traced back to the Middle Ages, but they were
rather exceptional at that time.
The disposal and utilization of land in the Middle Ages was ultimately a seigneurial prerogative and hence the limited instances of structural innovation in the form of enclosures and convertible husbandry can be explicated, to a large extent, by looking at the political and economic dimensions of manorial estates. Peasants, however, were not powerless entities since they were, after all, the ones who engaged in direct production, either in their own plots or in demesnes. Hence, any effort to innovate, especially on a large scale, presupposed their consent and cooperation.
Click here to read this article from the European Historical Economics Society
Related Posts
Subscribe to Medievalverse